No-nonsense, No-excuse!
ABA Research Design for Teachers

IDEA: Functional Behavioral Analysis & The Law: Proof

The GRAPH

The DATA

Is there a behavioral problem? How do you know? What can you do about it?

These are three critical questions when focusing on a Functional Analysis of behavior. Consider the above graph and the following example…...

The question: "Given John’s low frequency of ‘in-seat’ behavior, will the introduction of computer use as a reward when sitting in his seat prove an effective intervention?"

So, the teacher "withdraws the intervention" – and guess what …. Indeed, Johnny "returns to baseline rates of behavior". (Well, not exactly. He returns to his seat 20 times out of 50 rather than the 10 times out of 50 that brought the original behavior problem to the attention of his teacher. Nonetheless, the data suggest a marked improvement in his behavior.)

The ANSWER

Conclusion: "Let the data do the talking" – Yes, computer-use is an effective intervention for getting Johnny to "do what he otherwise resists" … returning to his seat when requested.

Some points:

The REFERENCES

(Be sure to consult first the refs marked with an *. If you have any questions, email me with the specifics. If we can't help you with a design problem, we will at least try to point you toward the solution: We aim to please!)

NOTE: Some computer-savy practitioners may want to consult the Carr & Burkholder reference in particular, cited below. The authors provide an excellent recipe for creating and customizing ABAB design graphs using Excel. Moreover, the authors also set forth the steps for creating Multiple Baseline graphs, also valuable for serious data-conscious teachers.

* Barlow, D.H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.

Birnbrauer, J.S., Peterson, C.P., & Solnick, J.V. (1974). The design and interpretation of studies of single subjects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 191-203.

* Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N.L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally. (Also published in 1966 as Experimental and Quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.)

* Carr, J.E., & Burkholder, E.O. (1998). Creating single-subject design graphs with Microsoft Excel. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 245-251.

Edgar, E., & Billingsley, F. (1974). Believability when N = 1. The Psychological Record, 24, 147-160.

* Hartmann. D.P., & Atkinson, C. (1973). Having your cake and eating it too: A note on some apparent contradictions between therapeutic achievements and design requirements in N=1 studies. Behavior Therapy, 4, 589-591.

Highet, G. (1951). The art of teaching. New York: Vintage Books.

* Huck, S.W., Cormier, W.H., & Bounds, W.G. (1974). Pseudo-experimental designs. In S.W. Huck, W.H. Cormier, & W.G. Bounds, Reading statistics and research (pp. 226-240). New York: Harper & Row.

Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lortie, D.C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Miller, D.C. (1983). Handbook of research design and social measurement (4th ed.). New York: Longman.

* Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.

Don't forget: Biblio-Refs offers dozens more references in this area.
Download and enjoy!